May 28, 2010

Pressure Swing Distillation - Use it Economically - 2

In the last post we discussed a bit about azeotropes & refreshed ourselves on basics.

So basically because of deviations from ideality (Raoult's Law), liquid mixtures form azeotropes.

Now, the phase envelope at different pressure suggest that the azeotropes shift due to change in pressure and this is our best tool to be utilized in the industry instead of going for extractive distillation where other solvent is used to carry over more of one component than other thus breaking the azeotrope.

Let us understand the conventional azeotropic distillation system, its basic, benefit & limitation.

The conventional method of separation of binary azeotropes have been through addition of another solvent to shift the equilibrium by forming ternary azeotrope. This is called azeotropic distillation.

The common example is to separate ethanol & water using cyclohexane. The ternary azeotrope of 7% Water, 17% Ethanol & 76% Cyclohexane boils off at ~62 C. So in the binary azeotrope of 95.6 % Ethanol and 4.4% Water, just enough cyclohexane is added to remove the water in 7 to 76 ratio which removes all water with some ethanol leaving almost pure ethanol at the bottom.

For example - For 100 Kg of ethanol azeotrope (means 4.4 Kg water) requires 4.4 x 76 / 7 = 47.8 Kg of Cyclohexane. This will carry all water i.e. 4.4 kg of water, 47.8 Kg of cyclohexane & 10.7 Kg Ethanol.

So WHAT????????????

This is just an example of azeotropic distillation where it can be used effectively, but just think if the azeotrope of ethanol water is say 60:40 in place of 95.6 & 4.4. Will it be possible by same system of cyclohexane let us see...

In this hypothetical case, 40 Kg water requires 434 Kg of cyclohexane & how much ethanol it will carry....97 Kg. SO It is not possible because all ethanol is also carried to top distillate & practically no separation.

So now you have fair idea about the benefits & limitations of azotropic distillation.

Therefore, I would like to explain something more which is more beneficial.

Pressure Swing Distillation
As explained earlier, the azeotrope composition varies with change in pressure. This can be understood from the following diagram.



In the above figure, you can clearly see that the azeotrope point is shifting towards right side at high pressure.

So if let us say point B = 30% of component A is at azeotrope now this mixture if pressure is raised will become point C at high pressure & then distillation can continue to point D of another azeotrope at that higher pressure.

So now if I again subject point D to same low pressure then it will become point E at low pressure but distillation can continue. So I can achieve 100% of component A.

This can be applied to any system without any issue and you have following benefits.

1. You do not need any third component.
2. You do not need two more columns for removal of solvent - one for solvent removal from light component & one for solvent removal from heavy component.
3. So more hardware cost.
4. So more energy cost also.
5. PSD (Pressure Swing Distillation) is very simpler to design.
6. No losses of components.
7. No Bulk quantities handling hence very low cost of operation.
8. Many more.........I am not in a mood to loist down all.

Now I will give you one practical example.....which I personally handled.
Ethanol & Ethyl acetate also forms azeotropes & I came across one such system with large quantities. So instead of considering Az Disitll I used PSD.

In this case, We came across an Az mix of ~69% Ethyl acetate (EA) & 31% Ethanol (EtOH). When we ran Aspen Simulation for PSD, we fixed the pressure of first column as 5.5 Bar (After Optimization) & 300 mm Hg for second column.

Now feed was sent to first column & we could recover EA from bottom as 99.9% pure and top was fed to vacuum column at 300 mmHg pressure. Here we coul dseparate 99.9% EtOH from bottom again. the top cut from second column was recycled to first column and thus there was no loss.

I also used it for separation of cyclohexane, EA & EtOH separation later on & my experience shows that slight moderate pressures of 2 to 5 bar can change azeotropes significantly.

So now on try to use it for your benefit & get the recognition from your Boss.

Print this post

7 comments:

Kamlesh said...

Sir,
Article is excellant. Please give schematic diagram to get the more clearity for the subject.

- Kamlesh
kbhariyani@gmail.com

Anonymous said...

It is definetly taken or inspired from Robin Smith... Conceptual Design for Chemical Processes...

Which was written years ago...
So NOT a novelty of your own...
But True as you said You FOLLOW... rather INVENT Unconventional approach
-
Deepak

profmaster said...

Successful process engineers means effective application of knowledge at the right place.

And just for your information, I never claimed that it is my novelity...NOR....I invented it, In fact it is clearly written in the post that "it is already known & is now becoming popular..."

By the way, your confidence is remarkable in using the word - Definitely taken or inspired from .....- as if you wrote this.

Thanks for comment...But I know you.

saradha said...

the description is very nice and easy understandable..........is tit possible to give information about at present in which industry is using pressure swing distillation column ?

profmaster said...

Saradha
It is not any industry specific. You can apply these fundamentals to any Azeo situation.
I suggest doing some lab experiments first at least at two different pressures. If you find a difference in equilibrium composition at those 2 pressures, you can use PSA method.

I have recently used this for 2 cases - one was separation of Alcohol & Ester and second was Ether & Alcohol separation.

Tim said...

Dear Sir,
Thank you for the many interesting blogs you post. this one has been of particular interest to me as I'm in the process of looking into methods for recovery of ethanol from a 80% ethanol/20% water solution. The target purity is 95% for the recovered ethanol.
I've been looking at fractional distillation but the benefits of PSD seem very attractive. I'm interested to get your opinion on our project requirements and suitablity of PSD.
Can you be contacted directly and would you be interested in providing some input based on a consultancy?

profmaster said...

Dear Tim
I can suggest you the best economical method. Just drop me your objective and detailed requirement without fixing constraints. You give me your mail ID I will send a test mail from my personal ID.
Thanks

Total Pageviews

Support Us

If you find this Blog useful Kindly take your time to donate some amount to keep it running.